Відео

Yeah, and people imitate each other. Just like AI. Some people are more set in their ways and are harder to manipulate, and some are easy. You can mimic that in an AI bot as well.

True😂

Love your channel ❤keep going . You've got this. Take your time . Your content is amazing.

I think your videos are interesting. I think I'm pretty knowledgeable about physics, compared to the average person, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to analyze your ideas well enough to figure out if they are nonsense or not. I wish this channel would get the attention of someone who knows how to do that better than I can, like @lukasrafajpps has done for some other physics channels. You do seem to know your stuff, at least to the point where I don't think you're a complete crackpot like Terrence Howard. I'm sure there are bound to be flaws in your ideas though. I say that because even the Einsteins of the world made mistakes, and benefited from having other scientists scrutinize his theories and sometimes they even proved him wrong. Even if your ideas turned out to be wildly wrong, they are different enough, that it would be very informative to have someone explain why. I get what you're saying about the system of gatekeeping for ideas to be taken seriously. The Terrence Howards of the world show why it is necessary to have some form of gatekeeping. There are genuinely crackpots who are completely clueless, but don't realize it, and there does need to be a way to filter these people out. I also think in the information age that knowledge is freely available to people who have not gone down a traditional academic route, and there is the potential for people outside of that system to have good ideas. They won't have the same guidance as in an academic route, which could be a double edged sword. They are free to blaze their own path, but are also more likely to get lost. I'm not really sure what the solution is for opening up science to more people but still filtering the crackpots out

Einsteinian gravity's predictions match observations better than Newtonian gravity's predictions. Similarly, the standard model - imperfect as it is - has better predictive power than any alternative explanations. While your ideas are interesting and compelling, unless your ideas result in more accurate predictions some aspect (or aspects) of reality than general relativity or quantum mechanics, then your ideas will simply remain fringe curiosities and not become a generally accepted scientific theory. The current academic system - again, imperfect as it is - is the best approach humanity has found for advancing knowledge. If you look closely, you'll find that no one's ideas are ignored if (and only if) they can demonstrate that their ideas have greater predictive power than the ideas in textbooks.

36:20 OMG, don’t forget to turn on the ClosedCaptions to see the audio as well! 🙃 This comment is for support. I have finally got around to learning with this fascinating lecture. ❤

People scream for MORE!

Dude, I’ve got an equal chance of proving the P equals or not NP conjecture as you do to unifying quantum gravity. Dunning-Kruger. The difference is is that I recognize my profound and I mean profound deficit in both intelligence and education to achieve that goal. You do not.

Thanks for the update. I find your theory the most interesting and compelling idea I've seen in a long time. Take your time, I look forward to your next video.

I don't want to spoil anything, but I am so excited about the potential of you collaborating with other science youtubers or even other academics. I won't pretend to understand everything about your theory, but your description of gravity as a dimension has already taken hold in my brain. Glad to hear you continue to develop this.

No need to be sorry in the slightest Chris. You've got a patient and thoughtful audience who don't mind waiting. Your work is just brilliant, so look after yourself. I'm excited for you and the next instalment.

Keep kickin’ butt Chris! ^.^

I think your light compass requires a measurement system for the one-way speed of light, and you seem to believe you have figure that out. So, I'd suggest that you simply start small and write your paper on how you intend to accomplish this (measuring the one-way speed of light). Assuming you have solved this dilemma, you'd easily be able to claim your Nobel prize.

With time travel in movies, I always wondered ... "if they're just popping out at different points on a timeline, thennn... Where's all the matter saved? There would have to be every atom for every thing in my house ready to be there at each point we went to. Is there some giant matter hard drive at every plank length, recording everything? Does the 4th dimension just look like a really long episode of hoarders? " Your focus on the fact the twins can see each other blew my whole mind up a lil tiny bit.

Dude thanks for linking you kiddos work. Its wonderful.

This is awesome! Love your rant, couldn't agree more.

I knew from the start it would be long time waiting in between Maybe if the videos were 15 minutes long, but you choose the 1hour+ format. I don't see how people could expect anything else (without being quite entitled), honestly

Not only I'm checking regularly your channel to get any update on your ideas, but I'd also like to thank you for being so open-minded and propositive. I totally agree on your Many Einsteins Interpretation (even if one doesn't have the proper tools to investigate and refine an hypothesis, maybe he could still have great intuition that others would want to address): thank you again for all your work, I can't wait to hear from you more on the topic.

I can't ..oh actually I definately can wait the next video. Take the time it takes to perfect it, or actually near perfet it, never try to perfect anything unles it surely is possible 😜

Thanks for all you do (and put up with.) Your videos are certainly worth waiting for. Keep up the good work!

First off, quality takes time. I'd rather you take your time and put out the best video you can. Second, Feed the Machine rocks. Your daughter is good people.

Is there no updates on the Words Matter series.

I wait patiently as well. Love your videos and thoughts. Hopefully it hasn't been too stressful. Would be cool to just have a conversation with you one day.

Looking forward to your video and I support you as well. I’d also like to add that it’s hard to find people that “think outside the box” and don’t limit themselves to what “everyone thinks” is the correct thing. A lot of people limit themselves because they believe it’s important to conform to the general consensus and like you said, that “general consensus” also limits itself because it makes people conform to itself. There is a lot of security in conformity and everyone just wants to be a peace and then there’s that rare person like you who is willing to step out of the box and start throwing chairs. I like it.

Keep up the great work and make sure you enjoy yourself.

Good call on "class-based gatekeeping of scientific brilliance". Been advocating that same idea, for years. Looking forward to the next video!

Wow a paper is actually very exciting! I look forward to sinking my teeth in 😆

Great to hear! Looking forward to it!

Take care man! I would like to voice my support, and say I look forward to your future videos.

There's no generic evil "system" designed to oppress people and science, there is a very specific system called capitalism and it is the worst kind of planetary cancer...

In fact, sometimes we need "outsiders" to bring new life and new thoughts to disciplines

some of the comments here are pretending the video is about them when theyre saying absolutely nonsense

Agreed Chris, and the awareness of manipulation makes consuming news/media challenging. The continued emphasise on what the public should be discussing, in the view of the editorial leadership. Bad enough in Australia but rampant elsewhere in the world.

Keep up the good work, very excited for when its ready :)

Einstein gave his child away and his wife did his mathematics. Life can get in the way. Hahaha. Keep the family first and build your theory. 😊

Ive been wondering about updates on your mind blowing theory for a while now and just for the first time got a notification, despite having you set on ALL...... Im glad this one showed up eventually. You are so so so right, especially about how we should diversify thinking. I cannot wait to hear more from you, altho I happily will as long as it takes!! Great things take time, and this has been, to me at least, one of the greatest and most logical theories I ever got presented with..!

Looking forward to your video and especially your perspective of HOW you will show to us the way YOU see that QM and Gravity can be unified. While trained as an engineering person to the MS level, and all my professional life having worked in the engineering field, I am also a biblical Christian, and thus I have come to understand and know that the Universe was created about 6000 years ago (rounding) in a series of six days (24 hours rounding). Recall, I am not a history or arts or commerce major, and so I KNOW WHAT science entails and requires TO BE science, and what its limits are. I say this because there are reasons Gravity and QM will not ever be fully unified SUCH THAT we can have a ToE. While there can be some effects of gravity on QM, I am unable to see HOW the reverse is even possible. There is ONE and ONLY ONE reason people. nearly doggedly, want to make the two be unified. I'll get into it after you post the video. Nevertheless, I look forward to your video and seeing what I might learn in this coming one; I have learned a lot from your earlier ones.

It’s taken me more than forty years to realize that 1x1=2. Expanding the mind beyond learned and preconceived notions is a trek.

Einstein's theories are pure junk science. Get over it my fellow university trained non-awake scientists. The universe is electric. So many great scientists know the electric universe theory is the best we have right now.

Take as much time as you need. You've picked a tough subject. I wait patiently to hear what you come up with.

I agree that PHD is an exercise in short term memorization and not really any kind of indication as to how smart someone is. However, I don't think that's what the bias is for. It's to weed out the 90% of conspiracy theorists and and general wackos that have some hair brained idea so you don't drown in the noise.

You are my HERO right now, man. It's like you said, there are geniuses, "Einstein's", everywhere, everyday. Picking tomatoes and mopping floors or something. The barriers that keep the genius in the "average joe clothes" are THE greatest obstacle between us and advancements at truly blazing speeds. I'm beyond glad that you are your theory are getting the respect that you deserve for pursuing this, and I will be cheering you on as the journey continues. Godspeed, Chris.

Pythagoras > Einstein

Do what you think is the best. My take on Einstein is that he is not just wrong, but that he is completely wrong. His basic illusion is the postulate of the equivalence of acceleration and gravity. Once you understand this flaw you will release and move on to better things such as the scalar waves which, incidentally, resolves/relates time and gravitation and energy. What helps are the advances Vik Grebennikov made with real results. The theories are okay but they can be challenged by just another theory, and another, and... Once you see what Grebennikov has done you will not need the theory. Good luck.

- I am patient. Based on what I have seen, I expect this will be worth the wait.

Love your content. Would you watch a video of mine if it furthered the goal of unifying the fields and/or letting me know if im crazy? I have a video exclaimig 1/27 to be the 3D rate of gravity , and i truly believe in the concepts at hand but im weighed down by lack of proper professional physics communication and education. Alot of the stuff you have especially about c not being the speed of light but of evolution i think connects. Thank you if you read this man!

Oh dear 🙈

I like your words, word man

AI is not an acronym. It is an abbreviation. Unsubscribed.

- Why wouldn't you take two clocks and seperate them from with even speed and acceleration to avoid different times or build a construction that sends a beam of light to adetector and a second one to a detector exactly behind the first one and then just measure the time it took for the light to travel the distance between the detectors? I don't get how it is supposed to be hard to measure one way speed of light - Wouldn't you just have a red & blue shift in you dyson sphere experiment? - Isn't in your train experiment both possible, depending on the pov? Relativity & stuff - "The speed of light could be infinite if it weren't constrained" is kind of a useless statement imo